Quick Review: Modern Warfare 3 vs. Battlefield 3

Discussion in 'Electronics/Home Theater/PC/Gaming' started by glorify, Nov 14, 2011.

  1. Offline

    Scott Administrator

    OK, here's my thoughts.

    After being stuck on Battlefield and MW3 for the last 3 weeks, I will just compare the two based on multiplayer only.

    Pros of MW3:
    Lots of Action: Literally 10 seconds until you are in the middle of a firefight
    Quick 10 minute matches: Easy to quit and do something else when you need to
    Lots of friends to play with
    Small map: Easy to find an enemy
    The "feel" of the weapons: Fells like you are unleashing a cannon on someone's head
    Graphics: Smooth as butter frame rate
    2 player splitscreen, even in multiplayer

    Cons of MW3:
    Too easy to rank up
    Clan Tag hackers that hack their clan tags to look like the xbox buttons annoying the piss out of me

    Holy Shit Moment:
    Fighting to keep a capture point in Domination

    Pros of BF3:
    Vehicles: Damn I love fucking shit up with a tank
    Destruction: I love blowing holes in buildings with my weapons, especially if there's a god forsaken sniper hiding in one. You can literally blow up almost anything with gigantic explosions.
    Squad Spawning: If you are playing with friends, it is easy to play with them side by side in a whole game.
    Ranking up: I have played roughly 40 hours of BF and I am only at level 28 out of 100. Each gun can have up to 20 attachments that rank up separately, and so does each vehicle. I doubt I will ever get to the end of the ranking system.
    Animations: Love the way you jump over things and also knife people in BF.

    Cons of BF3:
    The maps are fucking HUGE: Which is awesome if you have a vehicle, not so much if you spawn in a spot and have to run for 2 minutes until you MAY get into a battle.
    Team Deathmatch: It's OK, but I much prefer a good firefight in MW3 due to controls and MW3's 60 fps.
    20 minute matches
    Not keen on their grenades
    Campers

    Holy Shit Moment:
    I have two. There is not much better than fucking up an apache with a tank. Unbelievably hard and I did it twice in one match the other night. Also, hearing an RPG whiz by your ear 6 inches from your head, narrowly missing you: AWESOME.

    Verdict:
    It's a mood thing. Both are great games and they are both almost totally different. Each one is fantastic. If I have a short amount of time to play or want to party up, I play MW3. If I want to blow some shit up with some sheer devastation but also have some infantry fun, I play Battlefield.
    • Like Like x 3
  2. Offline

    ChargerMike BoltBruthaFromAnuthaMutha

    Haven't played either yet., but appreciate the breakdown, bro. :cool:
    • Like Like x 1
  3. Offline

    Scott Administrator

Share This Page