BF may have contacts to the Mossad. Any inside information must be originating from them and not the US. The propaganda machine is ratcheting up after today's incident in Bulgaria. “All signs point to Iran,” Mr. Netanyahu said in a statement released by his office. There was no immediate comment from Iran. But Mr. Netanyahu and other Israeli officials pointed out that the bus explosion came on the 18th anniversary of a bombing of an Argentine Jewish center in Buenos Aires that killed 85 people and wounded hundreds, an attack that Argentine prosecutors have blamed on Iran. Bellicose adversaries, Israel and Iran have a long history of accusing each other of terrorist attacks. Iran has blamed Israeli agents for a string of assassinations of Iranian nuclear scientists over the past five years, for which Iran has vowed revenge. Israel has accused Iranian agents of attacks on a range of Israeli tourists and diplomats in at least a half-dozen places around the globe. “Over the last few months we have seen Iran’s attempts to attack Israelis in Thailand, India, Georgia, Kenya, Cyprus and other countries,” Mr. Netanyahu’s statement said. He called the pattern a “global Iranian terror onslaught and Israel will react firmly to it.” http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/19/w...ia-tour-bus-kills-at-least-four-israelis.html
NYT is hilarious! "Iran said this and Israel said that". Hasbara never looks so innocent and neutral as it does in the NYT. Even mentioning that fake attack in India makes it automatically suspect that Izzy did all of them. Mossad used to not be out in the open with the joke but now they flaunt it with goofs like Bibi barely containing the coded language when talking about it.
You mean a yarmulke I trust. No doubt the antennas sticking out of it are a dead giveaway. http://www.jessyjudaica.com/blog/2011/08/17/did-you-say-yamaka-or-yarmulke/
http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2012/08/ohio-miners-required-attend-romney-rally The Pepper Pike company that owns the Century Mine told workers that attending the Aug. 14 Romney event would be both mandatory and unpaid, a top company official said Monday morning in a West Virginia radio interview.A group of employees who feared they'd be fired if they didn't attend the campaign rally in Beallsville, Ohio, complained about it to WWVA radio station talk show host David Blomquist. Blomquist discussed their beefs on the air Monday with Murray Energy Chief Financial Officer Rob Moore.Moore told Blomquist that managers "communicated to our workforce that the attendance at the Romney event was mandatory, but no one was forced to attend." He said the company did not penalize no-shows.
This is exactly what unions are for! You aren't supposed to be able to scare workers by calling something mandatory which implies sanctions, but also implies compensation....since it's your job that's calling for your attendance......while also pretending mandatory means something other than "forced to attend". Mandatory means required by law or rules. If they didn't have to go....why call it mandatory? And without that direct threat to their jobs.....why would a hard worker give up free time or a day off to go somewhere they didn't exactly want to be......without being paid? It's just silly to say such things. But the Century Mine is non-union....so they can treat their workers like this and get away with it! Stand up there and be a back-drop for a politician you don't even believe in and won't vote for.....without being paid to do so....if you want to keep your job.....cause it's mandatory. That's just one of the many ways workers are exploited without a union! Christie said last night that democrats are for teacher's unions while republicans are for teachers.......to which my wife immediately replied.....but teachers are for teacher's unions. We both laughed cause we both went to Rowan University which was founded as a teacher's college....so we know lots of teachers and educators in NJ.....and they hate what's happening to teacher's unions. Job security, benefits, and a place to go for redress of grievances......that's what unions do. Trying to make the entire institution of organized labor into a monster because some unions have gotten better than good contracts in worker's favor and because some union bosses have been corrupt.....is like saying their should be no president or congress, because some elected officials in those positions have been corrupt. The necessity for unions is clear if you know anything about the history of labor in this country and what happens to folks that can't organize or fight back when ownership or management gets out of hand. The idea that they'll take good care of workers and won't exploit them if given a chance is absurd. It's just part of who we are to try to get as much as we can for as little as we can....why would owners and managers be any different? Of course they would....and have.....but the lessons of history are lost on the average American. "We don't need unions.....let the market do it's thing" is what they say. They are laying off workers in the US left and right and outsourcing for cheaper labor......while somehow companies are magically reporting record profits....and folks don't seem to understand that decreasing the costs of doing business....lowering overhead (quality of goods and service, cost of facilities, and number of employees/amount of employee salaries) are the only way to grow profit when there isn't a higher demand for products (goods and services). Workers need a way to protect themselves and their families and to avoid being the first area of cuts if they can. They are gonna fit our classrooms with revolving doors and cause good hard-working teachers into scared Walmart employees with no ability to speak truth to power. I like Christie on some policies, but he's just wrong on the importance of unions. There is strength in numbers and he knows it. That's why they have to turn folks against their neighbors on this issue. Over 80% of teachers believe in their unions.....why don't we trust them to decide what's in their own best interest? Why are so many cheering for the administrators and managerial class when they are making policies that are against the very people they claim to be trying to help? Could it be that folks are following blindly and cheer-leading for their side and not giving much thought to the actual impact on those being affected by the policies and changes?
So the choice is voting for people who openly hate workers and people who pretend to like workers before firing all the teachers. I say to any Democrat voter choosing to be raped instead of killed that it's time to stop being afraid and vote for a Socialist or a Green...yes, Romney would get in but have some perception and dignity!
Well you know I don't advocate voting for the other side of that same horrible coin, but on this particular issue.....I particularly hate how one side is trying to make it so normal to attack the teacher's unions as being the problem.......while claiming to be for the teachers.....as if the teachers unions aren't the teachers and weren't formed by and for the teachers themselves. Teacher's unions are the teachers.......you can't be against one and for the other!
I know, they get worse and worse the more Obama proves he's one of them. So with Obama firing teachers and lying about walking shoes, we don't get a cultural message that unions suck but at least with Romney in there, the assault is in the open, loud and stupid.
